Chinese participants announced they will withdraw from this year’s Gwangju Biennale after the organizers allowed the National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts to label its exhibition as a "Taiwan Pavilion." The naming decision clashed with Beijing’s insistence on the "One China" principle, prompting a protest that culminated in the cancellation of the planned China Pavilion.

The dispute quickly moved beyond curatorial logistics, drawing in the Chinese embassy in Seoul and local officials. Diplomatic notes were exchanged, and the Chinese side warned that the controversy could echo past tensions such as the THAAD episode, underscoring how cultural events can become flashpoints in broader geopolitical rivalries.

For the biennial, the fallout raises questions about artistic autonomy and the limits of political pressure. While the foundation issued an apology and reaffirmed its non‑censorship stance, the absence of a Chinese presence will be felt across the exhibition schedule, and the episode may shape how future international pavilions negotiate identity and state sensitivities.

View original article